🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.